Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01270
Original file (PD2012 01270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1201270
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130515
SEPARATION DATE: 20030514


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG/E-6 (74B30/Information Systems Operator) medically separated for a low back condition. Her back pain began in 1994 and since then has consistently been diagnosed as “mechanical lower back pain.” The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent U4/L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The low back condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 and no other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the mechanical low back pain (LBP) as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Eligibility to apply to the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) for review of initial disability rating review fairness and accuracy ..”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting low back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030122
 VA* - (3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Mechanical Low Back Pain 5295 10% Limitation of Motion Lumbar Spine 5292 10% 20030822
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 3 20030822
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40303 (most proximate to date of separation )
** In a 20090915 VARD the Spine condition was changed to “Degenerative Disk Disease Lumbar Spine” with a rating of 40% effective 20090506.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges that VA Compensation & Pension (C&P) examination was referenced, but not available in the evidence before it; and, could not be located after the appropriate inquiries. Further attempts at obtaining the relevant documentation would likely be futile and introduce additional delay in processing the case. The missing evidence will be referenced below in relevant context; and, it is not suspected that the missing evidence would significantly alter the Board’s recommendations.

Low Back Condition. Service treatment records indicated a history of chronic LBP beginning in 1994 precipitated by a three mile ruck march. Range-of-motion (ROM) at orthopedic examination, 22 February 2002, 15 months prior to separation, recorded flexion of 70 degrees and extension “full”. Approximately a year prior to separation orthopedic consult recorded no neurological deficits and no pain radiation. On 4 September 2002, 8 months prior to separation, clinic record noted normal gait with intact heel toe walk, and intact sensation. Although the CI reported episodes of spasms, there was no objective finding of spasms on examinations. Radiographs of the lumbar spine were all normal. Although the CI reported intermittent radiation of pain to thoracic spine, all tests for neuropathy were negative. Orthopedic physician noted surgery was not considered. No muscle weakness, diminished sensation or asymmetrical reflexes are reported in the treatment records. Magnetic resonance imaging (6 months after separation) recorded no significant pathology. A MEB/narrative summary evaluation, 20 November 2002, 6 months prior to separation, symptoms were noted to be persistent and worsening. Tenderness to palpation was present in mid upper back region. Limping favoring left lower extremity was recorded. ROM was recorded with 90 degrees flexion (normal). Sensation, strength and reflexes were normal.

The VA accepted the Medical Department Activity examination recorded in Japan 22 August, 2003, 3 months after separation, in lieu of the CONUS C&P evaluation. The examination reported a lumbar flexion of 60 degrees with pain. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 10% for pain on motion code 5295 (lumbosacral strain). The VA rated 10% for slight limitation of forward flexion code 5292 (limitation of motion).

In accordance with DoDI 6040.44, the Board is required to recommend a rating IAW the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) in effect at the time of separation. The Board must correlate the above clinical data with the 2002 rating schedule which was in effect at the time of separation (applicable diagnostic codes include: 5292 (limitation of lumbar spine motion); 5293, (intervertebral disc syndrome), and 5295 (lumbosacral strain). The Board considered the rating under 5295, lumbosacral strain, and agreed there was characteristic pain on motion supporting the 10%. There is insufficient evidence to support the higher rating of 20% since there is no evidence of spasms occurring on extreme forward bending and no documented clinical evidence of spasms in any record prior to separation. The Board considered the 5292 limitation of motion code and agreed that ROMs in the record supported only a slight limitation of flexion; thus, a rating under this code would be of no benefit to the CI. The Board considered rating under code 5293 intervertebral disc syndrome. There was no evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment in this case, since no motor weakness was present and sensory symptoms had no functional implication. There was no evidence of incapacitating episodes for a higher rating under this code. The Board was unable to find any pathway to a higher rating under any applicable VASRD code. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication determination for the chronic LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the mechanical LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Mechanical Low Back Pain 5295 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120611, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010818 (PD201201270)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01409

    Original file (PD 2012 01409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the chronic mechanical LBP 10% under the VASRD code for lumbar strain in effect at the time citing characteristic pain on motion without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms on repeated examinations. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01699

    Original file (PD2012 01699.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the MEB exam (also 6 months prior to separation), the CI reported continued constant pain. The Board considered that the MEB exam of decreased pain-limited motion and the PT exam with slight decreased extension and lateral flexion measurements supported application of VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations) for a rating of 10% rather than the 0% evaluation based on the VA exam, which may have been on “a good day” for a condition which is known to vary from day-to-day. Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01181

    Original file (PD2012-01181.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20021117 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201181 BOARD DATE: 20130111 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (92A10/Automated Logistical Specialist), medically separated for chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP). (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00468

    Original file (PD2012 00468.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted the improved ROM on C&P exam 5 years after separation, and opined this to represent improvement of the condition with time and treatment.After discussion, the Board agreed that the limitation of motion of the spine at the time of separation was moderate(flexion to 20 inches from floor is about 50-55 degrees) and would support a higher rating of 20% under code 5292.The Board considered rating under code 5293, intervertebral disc syndrome. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00756

    Original file (PD2012-00756.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON: Service PEB – Dated 20011231 Condition Code Rating Low Back Pain 5299‐5295 0% VA – All Effective Date 20020520 Condition Mechanical Low Back Pain Thoracic Dextroscoliosis Cervical Spine … 0% X 4 / Not Service‐Connected x 2 Combined: 10%* Spine, Mild Code 5295 5291 5003 Rating 0%* 0% 10% Exam 20020208 20020208 20020208 ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 0% *Low back, 5295, changed to 5237 at 10% effective 20050706 with other conditions added for combined 60%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01090

    Original file (PD2013 01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. No evidence of spondylolysis or pars defect.”At the MEB medical examination...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00876

    Original file (PD 2012 00876.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Pre-Sep) – All Effective Date 20030426 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Mechanical Low Back Pain 5299-5295 10% Mechanical Low Back Pain w/ DJD 5293 20%* 20020719 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Residuals of Lightening Strike 9999 NSC 20020719 Combined: 10% Combined: 20% *VA rating increased to 40% effective 20050321; Chart based on VARD dated 20030429. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00708

    Original file (PD2012-00708.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated the condition 10% based on pain on forward motion under the 5295 code for lumbosacral strain. The VA reported 90 degrees of lumbar forward flexion and ROMs were consistent with near-normal ROMs from the AMA guidelines in effect at the time, and the Board adjudged these as slight limitation (IAW 5292, Spine, limitation of lumbar motion). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01451

    Original file (PD 2012 01451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating for disability at the time of separation. A physical therapy note, 9 months prior to separation, recorded normal gait, and mild tenderness. The Board noted the VA chose to rate the condition under the new spine rules that went into effect after the CI was separated.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00938

    Original file (PD 2012 00938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The PEB rated the CI’s back pain condition at 10%, coded 5295 (lumbosacral strain) citing pain with motion without spasm (but also noted moderate limitation of motion). RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as...